Begging Your Pardon

I was speaking to Phillip last night. You know Phillip. He’s one of Melbourne’s most active homeless people. Yes, one of those slurring, dishevelled characters imploring you to give them money while you are strolling down the city streets, off to buy a $17 cocktail at some dimly lit bar you read about on your MacBook. Phillip is one of the local beggars.

His story, that I have heard develop over the past few months, involves his inability to get Centrelink payments because he doesn’t have a permanent address. This is why he needs $3 from you so he can make the $26 it costs to get a room for the night. Once he makes that, he’ll mention that he just needs a bit more money for a meal now. You’re his only source of income.
 
Since I was first asked for change on Brunswick St, back when I was about 15, I adopted the philosophy that I still use today: having this money won’t make a big difference to my life, but it may someone else. The question that then arises is what are they using it for?
 
Some people are strict about only giving money to beggars who look like they aren’t on drugs or who seem to genuinely need it. Whatever ‘genuinely’ means. For some time I would only ever offer to buy the begging person a meal but would not giving them money directly. I’ve since abandoned such a condition. I don’t walk into Jack London, buy a pair of jeans, then specify that the manufacturers can only spend the income on food and not crack to snort up their sinuses at their end of year Christmas party. Although many wealthy business people destroy their lives with drugs and alcohol, we don’t demand that the money we give them is spent on things we are personally comfortable with.
 
I do accept that the transaction certainly feels less moral when we are in direct contact with a person who seems to want our money for substance abuse. Yet personally I can’t justify enforcing my opinion on how someone else should live their life, just because they are homeless or poor. In my view, life is indeed a transient experience we all grapple with in our own way. Who am I to assume that my balanced, well intentioned approach to it is right way? I’d pull the pin on my financial contributions if I felt it was funding something that causes suffering. Aside from that, it’s just an income for another human being living out their life in our big, hedonistic metropolis.
 
I happily use the term ‘income’ here because these Melbourne beggars, homeless or otherwise, are offering a service that we pay for just like any other business. They provide us with temporary relief from our bourgeois guilt about having more than we need to survive. If you don’t feel that you will experience emotional fulfilment in return, then don’t buy that service.
 
As for our friend Phillip he, like the rest of us, works for his income. He spends it on both necessities and the six-pack of Fosters I saw him chucking down the other night. The only judgement we should pass on him, as far as I am concerned, is that he has horrendous taste in beer.

Check back weekly for Moral Melbourne with @MrSimonTaylor (Twitter)

Comments

Posted by Leopold on May 2, 2011 @ 5:52pm
Leopold's picture

interesting take here, mr. moral melbourne. As a side point, here in melbourne we're far less exposed to homelessness than in other western, non-Australian capitals, as anybody who's spent time basically anywhere in Europe would attest. Anyway, I'm sure that in many instances homelessness and resultant begging is a genuinely unlucky and socio-economically charged decay of circumstance. I'm equally sure that in many instances it's the end result of decent human potential wasted by weak will and poor decisions. Whatever the root cause the final cut is the same. If, as you say, people who give to beggars are purchasing 'temporary relief from bourgeois guilt', then good on them. Personally, I accept that for some people life is a shit sandwich and every day is lunch. Better them than me. Count yourself lucky that you're not amongst them, and by all means continue to fill up on a nice can of altruism at 20 cents a pop.

Posted by David Meister on May 2, 2011 @ 6:15pm
David Meister's picture

check out Adelaide for the next level of service. All those soft drink bottles that say "refund in SA for 10c" are pretty good for the poor homeless. Find 10 bottles and you get a dollar; i'd say that's about as hard as asking 50 people for a dollar and the homeless get to keep more of their self respect.

Btw - Adelaide is a *really* clean city compared to Melbourne

Posted by Amelia Schmidt on May 3, 2011 @ 2:30pm
Amelia Schmidt's picture

in sydney, a huge part of the homelessness problem was caused by closing the mental asylums, which i think happened in the late '70s. a lot of mentally ill people were left with nowhere to go and no way to really take care of themselves, let alone get jobs and function in society, and became homeless basically because they couldn't really function in society like normal people.

there are a lot more homeless people in sydney and as far as i know, there is a system whereby they are taken to a shelter at night and deposited on street corners in the morning.

adelaide's system is pretty great by comparison. it IS a very clean town.

as for giving to homeless people - personally i don't do it, because i don't think it's the right solution to the problem of homelessness, in the same way that i don't think tourism in developing countries is really a good way to ever get those countries to 'developed' rather than 'developing'. i don't feel 'better' after i give a dollar to a homeless guy - i'd prefer to buy him a meal, but i'm not going to buy every homeless person a meal.

i would happily give a dollar a day to a fund that helps homeless people get jobs or promises to give them one full meal, but i don't really feel that giving a dollar to a homeless person is helping them or me very much at all.

that said, i do believe that most people to all charitable things out of self-interest, as the philosophy of egoism goes, but i don't think that the by-product of a feeling of moral superiority/lack of guilt discounts the good deed, nor do i think that it is the same to do a good thing to make yourself feel good, and to do a good thing and the by-product or side-effect is that you ALSO feel good.

Posted by Amelia Schmidt on May 3, 2011 @ 2:31pm
Amelia Schmidt's picture

*do all, not to all

Posted by Media Fortress on May 3, 2011 @ 4:52pm
Media Fortress's picture

Wtf Simon. Have you even tried Fosters in the past 10 years?

Illy Taking Off On National Tour
2,970 views 0 comments
Environmental Film Festival
1,924 views 0 comments
Cartoon Goulash
2,248 views 0 comments
Overload Poetry Festival
2,184 views 0 comments
Melbourne Fringe Festival
2,672 views 0 comments
War of the Walls Comes to Melbourne
2,459 views 0 comments
MrSimonTaylor's picture
MrSimonTaylor
Joined: 25th February 2011
Last seen: 19th November 2011